Systematic Errors (aka When the Whole Thing Is Tilted)
- Polly Ticherson
- Nov 1, 2025
- 4 min read
You ever notice how you can do everything “right” and still end up wrong — over and over — in the same way? That’s not bad luck. That’s not you being sloppy. That’s a systematic error.
Let’s make it simple.
Imagine a bathroom scale that’s always 5 pounds off. Not sometimes. Always.
You step on: 155.
Tomorrow: 155.
Next week: 155.
It looks consistent, so you trust it. But the truth is 150.
That’s the dangerous thing about systematic errors: they’re consistent, not accurate.
Random errors bounce around the truth.
Systematic errors lean the whole thing in one direction.
Same with a clock that’s always 5 minutes fast — it never tells the right time. It’s precise, but it’s wrong.
Now here’s the flip: our society works the same way.
When the Tool Is Biased, the Outcome Is Biased
If your scale is wrong, every weigh-in is wrong.
If your survey only talks to 9–5 office workers, every survey result is biased.
If your system is built on a skewed assumption, every person who goes through it carries that error.
That’s what I mean by systematic errors in real life:
A justice system that “protects the public” but somehow cages Black and brown communities at the highest rates for nonviolent offenses.
A school system that punishes trauma behavior instead of treating trauma.
A healthcare/VA system that says “thank you for your service” and then makes you fight a portal for six months to see a doctor.
An economic system that produces enough food and housing… but people are sleeping in cars and kids are hungry.
That’s not a glitch. That’s a design.
Or at least… it’s what happens when nobody is responsible for the design.
The Kid Example: Toxic Stress
A kid grows up in constant chaos — violence, housing instability, food insecurity, caregiver stress. That’s toxic stress. It’s not just “they had a hard childhood.” It literally rewires the developing brain: more alert to danger, less capacity to focus, harder to regulate emotions.
Then that kid goes to school and gets labeled “disruptive.”
Then they get suspended.
Then they fall behind.
Then they get profiled.
Then we act shocked when, at 18, they’re in the system.
That’s the same 5-pound error, just on a human life.
The child was calibrated wrong by the environment, and our schools never recalibrated. We punished the output instead of fixing the input.
Mass Incarceration = A National Bad Scale
We were told the system is about safety.
But when you’ve got 2+ million people locked up, mostly for nonviolent or low-level stuff, mostly from the same neighborhoods, that’s not “a few bad apples.” That’s the bathroom scale again.
If your system always lands on punishment over restoration, on cages over care, on surveillance over support — that’s not random. That’s systematic error. Built in. Paid for. Reinforced. Generational.
Veterans: A Promise with a Bug in It
We promise: “Serve your country, and we’ll take care of you.”
Reality: paperwork, waitlists, unprocessed trauma, homelessness.
That’s not because individual people don’t care — that’s because the intake process, the funding priorities, the admin layers were never designed for the human on the other end. It’s a system that protects itself better than it protects the people it was made for.
Again: consistent, not accurate.
So What’s Missing? Two Things.
Accountability.
In science, when you find a systematic error, you stop and recalibrate. You don’t keep publishing bad data.
In government/schools/policing, we find bad data and we… make a task force. We “review.” We “look into it.” We pass blame upward, downward, sideways — but not into the design.
A system with no one empowered to say, “Shut it down, it’s wrong,” will keep producing wrong.
Imagination.
We act like the current setup is the only possible way — as if we didn’t actually build it.
But school, court, prison, hospital, housing, currency — all invented. By people. With particular goals. At particular times.
If it was invented, it can be re-invented.
We lost the courage to ask, “What would this look like if it was designed for human thriving, not system survival?”
And Yes — We Do This Individually, Too
Systematic error isn’t just “out there.” It’s in here.
Keep dating the same kind of emotionally unavailable person? That’s a personal sampling bias.
Always start projects late and tell yourself “I work better under pressure”? That’s a self-calibration error.
Only consuming content that matches your opinion? That’s confirmation bias — a mental systematic error.
We call it “my type,” “my process,” “my personality,” but a lot of the time it’s just a pattern we never audited.
So What Do We Do?
Same thing scientists do.
Detect it.
Ask: “Am I getting the same wrong result from different inputs?” If yes → systematic.
Calibrate against a standard.
In life, the “standard” can be lived experience of impacted people, community data, historical truth — not just what officials say.
Change the instrument, not the person.
If the scale is bad, you don’t tell the person to lose 5 pounds. You fix the scale.
Build with humanity in the spec.
Don’t bolt care on later. Start with it. “Will this traumatize the child more?” should be as basic a question as “Do we have funding?”
Name who’s responsible.
“The system failed” is too abstract. People designed it, funded it, upheld it. People can change it.
The Real Authority
Authority isn’t just in offices.
A system keeps its bad settings until somebody outside it says, “No more. Re-run the whole thing.”
That’s organizers feeding people because policy didn’t.
That’s nonprofits treating toxic stress because schools didn’t.
That’s voters and parents and survivors saying, “Actually, we can imagine better.”
That’s the heart of better ways to better days — not vibes, but recalibration.
We don’t just have broken people in a working system.
We have working people trapped in broken systems.
Our job isn’t to teach people to tolerate the error.
Our job is to fix the scale.
If you’re ready to move from naming problems to building replacements, come find us at Rave4BetterDays.com — we’re literally in the business of recalibration.
.
.jpg)
Comments